Regional facilities support recompete
Civilian agency · Midwest region · Facilities support services
Executive read
This appears to be a credible early-stage pursuit for the example contractor. Service scope, geography, and historical contract size align with the company profile. The biggest unknown is whether the agency will use its final option period, so the recommended action is early relationship-building—not proposal writing.
Known facts
Why it fits
- The example contractor has two comparable projects within the previous five years.
- The site is inside its stated 250-mile operating radius.
- Historical value falls below its maximum practical contract size.
- No clearance, bonding, or contract-vehicle barrier is visible in the example record.
What could make this wrong
- The agency may exercise an additional option and delay a new procurement.
- The scope could be bundled into a larger regional acquisition.
- The acquisition strategy or set-aside category may change after market research.
- Historical data may omit a modification not yet reflected in the source system.
Next three actions
Verify the timeline
Check the agency forecast and contact the listed small-business office with a concise capability question.
Map the incumbent
Review award history, subcontracting signals, and likely strengths before deciding whether to prime or team.
Prepare a relevant proof point
Tailor one past-performance sheet to the location, staffing model, and service scope—without drafting a proposal.
Live source categories
A production brief links every factual claim to a record in sources such as: